Mining · Oil · Infrastructure

Nirman Setu

Site ki reality, plan ka reality - ab dono ek hi din.

Field reports sync to the live plan the same day - signal or no signal.

Field truth and plan truth, same day

Report from site. AI matches to the live plan. A planner keeps the pen. Offline days still sync.

Without Nirman Setu

  • Notes trapped in chat, PDFs, or paper
  • Plan updates days after the work happened
  • Offline days never leave the cabin
  • Nobody knows which spreadsheet is current
  • Delay cost compounds before the Gantt moves

With Nirman Setu

  • Plain-language reports + photos from the field
  • AI matches notes to plan tasks with confidence
  • Local save offline; sync when signal returns
  • Planner approve / reject - nothing auto-writes
  • Approved progress hits the live schedule same day

Core loop: Report → AI Match → Approve → Sync

Where each capability works

One programme truth across field phone, offline cabin, and planner desk.

Available Partial Not on this surface
Feature availability across Web, field phone, offline, and planner desk
Capability Web Field phone Offline Planner desk
Write site report view
Local save / queue -
Photos with report queued
AI match to plan on sync -
Approve / reject / flag - -
Live schedule sync status -
Confidence tiers read -
Audit trail read -

Works in modern mobile browsers. Offline uses on-device storage until signal returns.

The gap

Planning and execution still live in different worlds

Site engineers write reports in the field. Planners update schedules days later. By the time a delay shows on the Gantt, cost has already compounded.

Construction workers on site with heavy machinery
Field

Notes trapped on phones

Daily reports sit in chat threads, PDFs, or paper pads. Photos lack task context. When connectivity fails, yesterday's progress never leaves the site cabin.

Project manager reviewing schedules on laptop
Planning

Manual matching, stale truth

Someone retypes field notes into Primavera, MS Project, or Excel. Matching unstructured text to WBS codes is slow, error-prone, and always behind the site.

Leadership reviewing project boards in a meeting
Leadership

Decisions on last week's data

Delay alerts arrive after the window to recover. Stakeholders argue about which spreadsheet is current. The programme looks fine until it suddenly is not.

Scroll or tap a dot - each point takes the spotlight

The operating idea

Field reports leave the cabin. AI matches them to the live plan. A planner keeps the pen. Truth syncs when the signal comes back.

Scroll to walk the idea

Gear that maps to the job, not the org chart

Mining, oil, and civil packs you already recognize on site. Open a module and start reporting.

Icons from Koboyo · card pattern inspired by AI Canvas 3D Product Card

How Nirman Setu connects field to plan

AI proposes. Planners decide. The schedule stays truthful.

Engineer reviewing field systems on site
Site Engineer path

Write report with photos → Local save → Auto-sync when online → Confirm suggested task links

Planner path

Open review queue → Sort by confidence → Approve, reject, or flag risk → Dashboard and schedule update

The loop

Four steps. Report to sync.

Sticky visual cards. Scroll to stack each chapter - AI proposes, planner keeps the pen.

Construction crew reporting progress on an active worksite
Field

Report

Capture progress in plain language and photos from the site, online or offline.

Local save always 01 / 04
Engineer matching site notes on a tablet
AI

AI Match

System links notes to plan tasks and scores confidence so review stays focused.

Confidence scored 02 / 04
Planner reviewing and approving programme updates at a desk
Planner

Approve

Planner accepts, rejects, or flags risk. Human authority stays on every change.

Nothing auto-writes 03 / 04
Live project dashboard syncing approved field progress
Programme

Sync

Approved progress hits the live dashboard and schedule with a full audit trail.

Same-day truth 04 / 04

Built for the people who carry programme truth

One operating layer for field, planning, and leadership. No new reporting ritual.

Field

Site engineers

Keep writing the way you already write. Add photos when useful. Connectivity is optional.

  • Offline draft and local save
  • Suggested task links to confirm
  • Less retyping for the planning team
Planning

Planners & PMO

Review a confidence-ranked queue instead of hunting through chat and email attachments.

  • Approve / reject with one clear action
  • Risk flags before schedule commits
  • Traceable history on every task
Leadership

Project leads

See confirmed progress the day it happens, not after the weekly spreadsheet chase.

  • One source of programme truth
  • Earlier delay visibility
  • Org-isolated project data

auto scrolls a few times · hover to pause

Offline-first by design

Remote corridors, tunnels, and low-signal zones are normal for infrastructure work. Reporting should not wait for a bar of reception.

Write reports with zero connectivity. They save locally and sync the moment the device finds a signal. No data loss. No "try again later." Drafts stay on the device until the upload confirms.

  • Local-first storage with conflict-safe sync when back online
  • Photo attachments queued with the same report payload
  • Clear sync status so engineers know what is still pending

Works in remote sites, tunnels, and low-signal zones.

Engineer using tablet on construction site

Human authority stays on every automated suggestion

Four controls that keep AI helpful without handing it the pen. Scroll to stack each layer.

Approval

Planner in the loop

AI suggests matches and flags risks. A responsible human always approves or rejects. Nothing is auto-written into the schedule. The planner keeps final authority on every change that hits the live plan.

Human sign-off required 1 / 4
Scoring

Confidence tiers

Every match carries a clear score: Confirmed, Review Needed, or Possible Risk. Low-confidence items never slip through quietly. They surface for review before they can distort progress reporting.

No silent low-confidence writes 2 / 4
History

Audit trail

Who reported, who approved, when it synced. Full history stays attached to the task, so when questions come up weeks later, context is still on the record, not lost in chat threads.

Full provenance per task 3 / 4
Ownership

Data stays yours

Project data is isolated by organisation and project code. Site notes are never used to train models without explicit consent. Your programme remains your programme.

Org-isolated by design 4 / 4

The people behind Nirman Setu

Six builders closing the gap between site reports and schedule truth. Swipe, tap a dot, or pick a name.

Team collaborating around a table
auto swipe up · drag anytime

Mobile app

Pick up where you left off

Continue an offline draft, confirm a task link, or check sync status from the site. Same project truth as the desk, in your pocket.

Supports iOS 15+ and Android 10 · Offline drafts included

Close the planning-to-execution gap

Ab plan aur zameen ki sachai ek saath chalti hai.

Start with one project. Site engineers keep writing the way they already do. Planners see reality the day it happens, with approval, confidence tiers, and an audit trail on every update.

Start My Free Project

No credit card - Under 3 minutes - Role-based access